UK Home Energy Guide
UK Home
Energy Guide
Yorkshire Dales stone houses

Original research

The most beautiful homes in England have the worst energy ratings

We analysed 200,000+ EPC records across 40+ council areas to find where homeowners have the biggest opportunity to cut their energy bills. The answer surprised us.

Stone cottages in the Lake District. Sandstone terraces in the Yorkshire Dales. Limestone farmhouses in rural Cumbria. They're some of the most desirable homes in England, and they're haemorrhaging energy.

We went through the government's EPC register, every domestic Energy Performance Certificate lodged in England, and compared current ratings against potential ratings across more than 40 council areas. The question was simple: where could homeowners make the biggest improvement?

55%

of homes in South Lakeland could jump 2 or more EPC bands

The highest of any area we analysed

The top 6 areas

The pattern was unmistakable. The areas with the highest improvement potential weren't the places you'd expect, not deprived urban centres or post-industrial towns. They were the scenic, rural, stone-built parts of northern England.

1

South Lakeland

Kendal, Windermere, Kirkby Lonsdale

55%

could jump 2+ bands

66%

rated D or worse

38%

no wall insulation

2

Craven

Settle, Skipton, Grassington

52%

could jump 2+ bands

63%

rated D or worse

36%

no wall insulation

3

Hambleton

Northallerton, Thirsk, Stokesley

52%

could jump 2+ bands

65%

rated D or worse

34%

no wall insulation

4

Copeland

Whitehaven, Egremont, Cleator Moor

49%

could jump 2+ bands

61%

rated D or worse

45%

no wall insulation

5

Eden

Penrith, Appleby, Kirkby Stephen

47%

could jump 2+ bands

60%

rated D or worse

45%

no wall insulation

6

Barrow-in-Furness

Barrow, Dalton, Askam

45%

could jump 2+ bands

66%

rated D or worse

49%

no wall insulation

Now compare that to the cities

The contrast is striking. In Manchester, only 3% of homes could jump 2 or more bands. In Newcastle, 6%. These cities have newer housing stock, more flats, more cavity walls already insulated. There's less room for improvement because the homes are already closer to modern standards.

3%

Manchester

could jump 2+ bands

6%

Newcastle

could jump 2+ bands

5%

Hull

could jump 2+ bands

7%

Liverpool

could jump 2+ bands

South Lakeland at 55% vs Manchester at 3%. That's not a small difference, it's a completely different world.

Why stone walls are the story

Every area in our top 6 has a high proportion of stone-built homes. Sandstone, limestone, granite, the traditional building materials of northern England. They're solid walls with no cavity. You can't pump insulation into them like a modern cavity wall. Heat goes straight through.

A typical uninsulated stone wall loses heat 4 times faster than an insulated cavity wall. In Barrow-in-Furness, 49% of homes have no wall insulation at all. In Copeland and Eden, it's 45%.

These homes were built to last centuries. They weren't built to be thermally efficient. But with internal wall insulation, they can be, and the Great British Insulation Scheme may cover the cost.

The methodology gap

There's another factor. Many of these rural homes were last assessed years ago, under an older methodology. Before 2017, EPC assessors didn't include heat pumps or solar panels as standard recommendations. The potential rating on a 2012 EPC only considered traditional improvements, loft insulation, double glazing, a new boiler.

Today's methodology (RdSAP 10, introduced June 2025) includes heat pumps, solar PV, battery storage, and accounts for a cleaner electricity grid. The same stone cottage assessed in 2012 might have been told it could reach D. Assessed today, it would likely show potential B.

That's why the real opportunity in these areas may be even bigger than the numbers suggest.

What this means if you live in one of these areas

1

Get a fresh EPC

If yours is more than a few years old, the potential rating is probably out of date. A new assessment (typically £65–£100) will show what's actually possible with today's technology. Read our EPC guide →

2

Check your grant eligibility

The £7,500 heat pump grant is universal. The Great British Insulation Scheme targets areas with poor housing quality, which includes most of these top 6. Free insulation is a real possibility. See all grants →

3

Understand the property value impact

Moving from D to B can add 5–8% to your property value. On a £300,000 Lake District cottage, that's £15,000–£24,000. The improvements often pay for themselves through a combination of energy savings and property uplift.

The bottom line

The homes with the most to gain from energy improvements are the ones that look like they'd be the hardest to fix. Stone walls, rural locations, old heating systems. But “hardest to treat” also means “most to gain.” And the government knows it, that's why the grant schemes are weighted towards exactly these properties.

If you live in the Lake District, the Yorkshire Dales, Cumbria, or anywhere with stone-built housing: your home probably has more potential than you think. The first step is finding out.

Check your home

Enter your postcode to see your EPC rating, energy costs, and what improvements could save you.

Search your postcode →
Methodology and data sources

Data from the MHCLG EPC Open Data Register under Open Government Licence v3.0. We analysed up to 5,000 EPC records per local authority area across 40+ council areas in England, comparing current energy ratings against potential ratings.

“Band improvement” is the difference between a property's current EPC band (A–G) and its potential EPC band as assessed. “Could jump 2+ bands” means the potential rating is 2 or more bands higher than the current rating (e.g. E→C or D→B).

Wall insulation data is from the EPC “walls-description” field. Properties recorded as “no insulation” or “assumed no insulation” are counted as uninsulated.

This analysis uses the sample available through the EPC API (up to 5,000 records per query) and may not represent the complete housing stock of each area. Results should be treated as indicative.